Can we consider photography as an art?

As a relatively new medium, photography is not one of the traditional seven forms of art but it is included in the broader definition of the visual arts. Within the visual arts, photography can be categorized as either fine art or commercial art.

Why photography is not accepted art?

One reason early photographs were not considered works of art because, quite simply, they didn’t look like art: no other form possessed the level of detail that they rendered. For this reason, it’s no surprise that some of the earliest applications of photography came in archaeology and botany.

Is photography considered as an art or as a science?

The Science of Photography Photography is both an art and a science. The camera, which creates art, also captures and teaches us scientific understandings. Some of them are not visible by the human eye for various reasons. They may happen too quickly, are too small or are too far away.

Why is photography considered as an art?

Photography as an art form arose from advancements in technology which allowed photographers to manipulate their images to fit their artistic expression. Photographers are able to drastically change the outcome of an image through choosing various cameras, lenses, film, and the framing and timing of a shot.

Do art critics think photography is art?

Photography couldn’t qualify as an art in its own right, the explanation went, because it lacked “something beyond mere mechanism at the bottom of it.” At best, critics viewed photography as a useful tool for painters to record scenes that they may later more artfully render with their brushes.

How come photography is now considered as art?

When did photography start being used as art?

So, by the early 1940s photography was officially considered as an art form in the United States, and people in Europe and other areas worldwide soon started sharing this opinion. Leading to its general adoption as a valuable form of art with investment potential.