Is Bentham Science a good journal?

Bentham Science is a science, technology, and medical publisher, providing academic researchers and industrial professionals with the latest information in diverse fields of science and technology. Our peer-reviewed scholarly journals and books have an ever-increasing readership of millions of researchers worldwide.

Is Bentham Science Scopus indexed?

According to the information presented, Bentham Science is among the top 14 publishers which have their publications indexed in Scopus. Bentham Science will continue to expand on its product portfolio in line with its mission to facilitate the publication of latest research around the globe.

What happens if you publish in predatory Journal?

If you publish in predatory journals you are unlikely to get recognition by your peers and you may even damage your reputation. predatory journals do not have the same peer review standards as more reputable journals means that the work has no place in the scientific archive.

Is World Scientific a predatory publisher?

World Scientific Publishing is an academic publisher of scientific, technical, and medical books and journals headquartered in Singapore. The company was founded in 1981. In 1995, World Scientific co-founded the London-based Imperial College Press together with the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

Is open Psychology a predatory Journal?

It’s on Bealls list of predatory journals… The Open Psychology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews and Letters in the field of psychology, aiming at providing the most complete and reliable…

What is a predatory science journal?

Predatory journals are those that tend to publish low-quality science and deviate from best editorial practices. They might use false or misleading information, or aggressive solicitation practices, and collect fees for publishing work that undergoes little editorial scrutiny.

What makes a journal predatory?

The consensus definition reached was: “Predatory journals and publishers are entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publication practices, a lack of transparency, and/or the use of aggressive and …

Is Austin Publishing Group predatory?

In addition to these telltale signs, Austin Publishing Group made it onto Beall’s list of predatory journals and has been the subject of complaints for its spam. It is not obvious who is behind this enterprise.

Are Mdpi journals reputable?

MDPI journals fall short compared to PLOS but they are respectable and are building their reputation. Charges are proportional to the journal reputation and most times can be waived if the author makes its case of lack of funding and it is completely independent of the review process.

Is Bentham (Open) a predatory publisher?

This ‘Bentham’ has received criticism and was/is listed as a “potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publisher” in Jeffrey Beall’s list of Predatory Publishers. Bentham (Open) has become notorious of spamming scientists with invitations to become members of the editorial boards of its journals.

Why choose Bentham Science Publishers?

Unrestricted and free utilization of research publications, especially by the developing nations, will ideally serve the very basic objective of scientific research and scientific publications. Bentham Science Publishers is an established name in the industry.

Are the allegations against Bentham Open really true?

These allegations in general are not grounded in reality. Bentham Open is actually charging quite an affordable fee for Open Access as compared to other known publishers and, in case of authors from the Developing world, the publisher makes it totally free for the contributor. For more information, you can check:

How many Bentham Science journals have received JCR impact factors?

As of 2021 40 Bentham Science journals have received JCR impact factors. Bentham Open, its open-access division, has received some criticism for its questionable peer-review practices, and was listed as a “potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publisher” in Jeffrey Beall ‘s list of Predatory Publishers.