Why is Indian judicial system so bad?

The inadequate number of judges as well as courts in the country is one of the primary causes of delayed disposal of cases. In the year 2000, unlike 107 judges to every million in the US, 75 in Canada, India only had 10.5 per million people. Incompetent and inefficient judges is another such reason.

What country has the weakest justice system?

The lowest ranking countries with the worst judicial systems are Venezuela, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Egypt, and Cameroon. Russia is ranked precariously low as well as mostly African and Asian countries that are not known for upholding civil rights of its citizens.

Is the judicial branch weak or strong?

The judicial branch—even though it has the power to interpret laws—is considered the weakest of the three branches by many because it cannot ensure that its decisions are enforced.

Why Indian judiciary is so slow Quora?

Every judge in lower court has to decide minimum cases and award units accordingly. After completion of units in a month, judges adjourn the cases for next month. It cause slow disposal. Incompetence of judges also slow the system.

What is the rank of India in World Justice Project?

India has ranked 79 out of 139 countries and jurisdictions in the World Justice Project’s (WJP) Rule of Law Index 2021. The WJP Rule of Law Index 2021 ranks the countries based on scores ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating the strongest adherence to the rule of law.

Is the judiciary still the weakest branch of government?

Judicial Branch is established under Article III of the Constitution. It was created to be the weakest of all three branches of government. Each branch has its own characteristics, but what distinguishes this branch from other two is that Judiciary is passive.

Which branch of government is the weakest and why?

In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton said that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had “no influence over either the sword or the purse, It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.” Federalist No.