Was Arjuna a Womaniser?
Table of Contents
Was Arjuna a Womaniser?
Arjun is a womanizer; he loves women and is loved by them. But in Virat’s palace he spends the entire year as a eunuch dancer, unable to indulge in his urges. Nakul, Sahadeva and Arjuna do not want to disobey their eldest brother. But Bhima fights back, goaded by a furious Draupadi, tired of her husbands’ restraint.
What kind of person was Arjuna?
He is the most popular champion in Hindu literature, a demigod (son of the storm god Indra), and the third of the famous Pandavas, the five noble brothers who serve as the protagonists of the Mahabharata. Arjuna represents the best aspects of humanity: Courage, Strength, and Humility. Intelligence and Wisdom.
Why Arjuna had so many wives?
From his four wives, Arjuna had four sons, one from each wife — Shrutakarma, Iravan, Babhruvahana and Abhimanyu. During his second exile, Arjuna gained many celestial weapons….
| Arjuna | |
|---|---|
| Children | Shrutakarma by Draupadi Iravan by Ulupi Babruvahana by Chitrangada Abhimanyu by Subhadra |
Was Arjun a good person?
Arjuna was the son of Pandu, who received his rigorous training of archery by Guru Dronacharya. He was deemed to be humble, courageous, and righteous as well. And this righteousness or ” dharma ” as we call it was the foremost reason why he was able to defeat his opponents, the Kauravas in the war of Kurukshetra.
Was Arjuna a womanizer Quora?
No. Arjuna wasn’t a womanizer. He didn’t actively seek out women.
Why did Ganga curse Arjuna?
The Vasus, Bhīṣma’s brothers, cursed Arjuna after he killed Bhīṣma through treachery in the Kurukshetra War. When Ulupi heard of the curse, she sought the help of her father, Kauravya. Her father went to Ganga, Bhīṣma’s mother, and requested her for a relief from the curse.
Was Karna really a good person?
Karna joined the Duryodhana’s side in the Kurukshetra war. He was a key warrior who aimed to kill 3rd Pandava Arjuna but dies in a battle with him during the war. He is a tragic hero in the Mahabharata, in a manner similar to Aristotle’s literary category of “flawed good man”.