What is the criticism of the cosmological argument?

Critics of the cosmological argument contend that the Causal Principle or, where applicable, the broader Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) that underlies versions of the argument, is suspect.

Which word best defines the cosmological argument?

noun Philosophy. an argument for the existence of God, asserting that the contingency of each entity, and of the universe composed wholly of such entities, demands the admission of an adequate external cause, which is God. Also called cosmological proof . Compare first-cause argument.

Why is the cosmological argument important?

cosmological argument, Form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of God. The first-cause argument begins with the fact that there is change in the world, and a change is always the effect of some cause or causes.

What are cosmological argument strengths?

The Cosmological provides an a posteriori explanation for the alternative. Strength: The Cosmological argument states that everything must have a cause yet explain this with the idea of an un-caused being who was the first the first cause.

Why is the cosmological argument a good argument?

The word logos suggests a study of something while the noun cosmos means order or the way things are. Thus, a cosmological argument for the existence of God will study the order of things or examine why things are the way they are in order to demonstrate the existence of God. There needs to be a cause for the universe.

Is the cosmological argument a good argument?

The first mover or first cause is devoid of any other characteristic. So the cosmological argument is neither a valid argument in requiring the truth of its conclusion nor is it a satisfactory argument to prove the existence of any being that would have awareness of the existence of the universe or any event within it.

Is the cosmological argument a posteriori?

It is an a posteriori argument and by that is meant that it proceeds after considering the existence of the physical universe. This argument or proof proceeds from a consideration of the existence and order of the universe.

What does Kant say about the cosmological argument?

Kant represents the cosmological argument as comprising two parts: first, the argument that since something exists therefore a necessary being exists; second, the argument that if anything is a necessary being then it must be an infinitely perfect being, that is, God.

What are the three ways of the cosmological argument?

Aquinas’s first three arguments—from motion, from causation, and from contingency—are types of what is called the cosmological argument for divine existence.