Why do philosophers not like Sam Harris?

There are four main issues that philosophers have with Sam Harris. The first is that Sam Harris is racist. The second is that Sam Harris makes bad philosophical arguments. The third is that Sam Harris makes disingenuous philosophical arguments.

What type of philosopher is Sam Harris?

Samuel Benjamin Harris (born April 9, 1967) is an American philosopher, neuroscientist, author, and podcast host. His work touches on a wide range of topics, including rationality, religion, ethics, free will, neuroscience, meditation, psychedelics, philosophy of mind, politics, terrorism, and artificial intelligence.

How does Sam Harris define morality?

Harris suggests that, much like physical health, well-being eludes concise definition. Although the use of well-being is not precisely operationalized, he does define morality as “the principles of behavior that allow people to flourish” (p. 19).

What type of psychologist is Jordan Peterson?

research psychologist
Peterson is both a clinical and research psychologist, meaning he sees patients while also doing research. After he received his PhD in psychology from McGill University, one of Canada’s two most prestigious universities, in 1991, he spent two years practicing at McGill’s hospital.

Is Sam Harris a moral realist?

Harris provides a compelling argument for selective intolerance toward harsh moral traditions. He argues via a kind of moral realism, linked to a form of utilitarian ethic, but these, I submit, are not doing the real work. Even sceptics about a strictly objective morality can reach a similar conclusion.

Is Jordan Peterson a philosopher-scientist?

If we think of Harris as a philosopher-scientist, Peterson is more like a philosopher-storyteller. A self-described existentialist and pragmatist, Peterson rarely uses formal logic and is far less structured and systematic in his approach than is Harris.

What are the criticisms of Harris’s moral philosophy?

Much like Peterson’s moral philosophy, there have been many criticisms of what Harris proposes. Criticisms include that the first and second ways to bridge the fact/value gap contradict one another.

What is Harris’s philosophical theory about well-being?

In The Moral Landscape, Harris makes clear that his philosophical theory revolves around the concept of “well-being.” Early in the book, Harris outlines three ways by which he believes the fact/value-distinction can be bridged:

How do Jordan Peterson’s fans react to his interviews?

Many of Peterson’s fans also react towards his interviews as I did towards his debates. After watching dozens of terrible interviewers interrogate Peterson, his fans developed a prejudice towards all of his future interviewers.