Are there ever reasons to break the law?
Table of Contents
Are there ever reasons to break the law?
Second, one must be breaking the law for the correct reasons. A person must break the law not because it is convenient to do so, but because they sincerely believe the law is unjust. If you truly believe the law is wrong, you should break it in a public way so that people can see what you are doing.
Who said laws are made to be broken?
| NUMBER: | 1649 |
| AUTHOR: | Douglas MacArthur (1880–1964) |
| QUOTATION: | Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind. |
| ATTRIBUTION: | DOUGLAS MACARTHUR.—William A. Ganoe, MacArthur Close-Up, p. 137 (1962). |
| SUBJECTS: | Rules |
What does it mean rules are made to be broken?
saying. used to say that it is good and acceptable to not obey a rule.
What makes a law unjust?
An unjust law is a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself. This is difference made legal. On the other hand a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow that it is willing to follow itself.
Who first said records are meant to be broken?
Mark Spitz Quotes Life is true to form; records are meant to be broken.
Why you should always follow the rules?
All our lives we are being taught and indoctrinated to follow rules. Rules are meant to stabilize the society as well as to organize our lives. We should obey the rules and regulations because they are there to comfort us and to make our lives easier. Rules do not confine us.
Why are rules made?
Answer: Rules are established to protect the weaker class in the society since they are at a disadvantage if such regulations are broken. When rules are properly set and followed, they provide a stable environment and human co-existence in a community, resulting in peace and order.
Is there a rule or law that can be broken?
No rule or law is meant to be broken. It all depends on what caused that rule or law. The intention of the rule or law was to put constraints around something. There was a reason for adding those constraints. If the rule was meant to be broken, it wouldn’t have become a rule.
What is the difference between laws and rules?
It depends on what rules really. All laws are make to be kept, But rules are made to be broken, Its the easiest distinction you need rules are not solid, Its the very reason that governments don’t make ‘rules’ they make something that actually has a solid structure like ‘laws’.
Why are level laws made to be broken?
Laws are not made to be broken, but many times are made because the principle the represent was being stomped on.
Should the P rules be broken?
Rules that do not have the respect of those it is intended to guide must be broken. Laws cannot change minds nor can they stop emotion. It is the will of the P Rules and the Law can only operate in a Society where the Law is applied equally to all. Obviously, we do not have that society. If we did prisons would be empty.