What influential book did Machiavelli write?

Niccolò Machiavelli’s two most important works are Discourses on Livy (1531) and The Prince (1532), both of which were published after his death. He wrote several other works, including Florentine Histories (1532) and The Life of Castruccio Castracani of Lucca (1520).

What book did Machiavelli write what makes leader most effective?

In 1513, after being expelled from political service with the takeover of Florence by the Medici family, Machiavelli penned his outline of what makes an effective leader in The Prince.

Why was the Prince by Machiavelli important?

In conclusion, The Prince is significant to the history of political thought because it advocates a purposeful approach to problems. Because he believed that the world could not be changed by leadership he proposed a system of governance based around making the most of what was available.

What is Machiavelli’s purpose in writing The Prince?

Machiavelli desperately wanted to return to politics. One of his goals in writing The Prince was to win the favor of Lorenzo de’ Medici, then-governor of Florence and the person to whom the book is dedicated; Machiavelli hoped to land an advisory position within the Florentine government.

What was the importance of The Prince book?

The significance of The Prince is clear as it is the work of a man who experienced the reality of leadership. His message is based on real world experiences rather than ideals and assumptions, and as a consequence advocated the sacrifice of certain principles in order to achieve success.

Who was Machiavelli and what did he advocate in the book The Prince?

Machiavelli (1469–1527) was an Italian statesman and political philosopher whose most famous work, Il Principe (The Prince, 1532), put forward the controversial idea that a successful ruler would sometimes have to commit immoral acts, such as deception or ruthless killing, in order to maintain his rule and the …

What was the significance of Machiavelli?

Machiavelli was the first theorist to decisively divorce politics from ethics, and hence to give a certain autonomy to the study of politics.