What was fighting like on the Eastern Front in ww1?

While the war on the Western Front developed into trench warfare, the battle lines on the Eastern Front were much more fluid and trenches never truly developed. This was because the greater length of the front ensured that the density of soldiers in the line was lower so the line was easier to break.

How was fighting on the Eastern Front different from fighting on the western front?

A major difference between the Eastern and Western Fronts was their size. The larger Eastern Front meant that the war there was more fluid, and fighting was characterized by mobility and offensives. The smaller Western Front saw much less movement, and fighting was characterized by defensive trench warfare.

What were some of the conditions that soldiers on front lines had to face?

What were some of the conditions that soldiers on the front lines had to face? In the trenches, there were poor conditions such as drowning if it rained, lack of sanitation, and being covered in mud. Soldiers fought each other from trenches and armies traded huge losses of human life for pitifully small land gains.

How did American troops save Paris?

Carrying reinforcements that turned the tide of battle against the Germans, the taxi drivers saved the city and demonstrated the sacred unity of the French people.

What happened at the Eastern Front?

The Eastern Front was decisive in determining the outcome in the European theatre of operations in World War II, eventually serving as the main reason for the defeat of Nazi Germany and the Axis nations. The two principal belligerent powers were Germany and the Soviet Union, along with their respective allies.

What was fighting like on the Western Front?

On the Western Front, the war was fought by soldiers in trenches. Trenches were long, narrow ditches dug into the ground where soldiers lived. They were very muddy, uncomfortable and the toilets overflowed. In the middle was no man’s land, which soldiers crossed to attack the other side.