What is the difference between Akka and Kafka?
Table of Contents
What is the difference between Akka and Kafka?
Kafka is an event streaming platform, loosely residing in the Message-Oriented Middleware (MoM) space. Akka is an Actor Model — a mechanism for concurrent computation based on the concepts of agents, immutability, and message passing.
What is the difference between ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ?
ActiveMQ is used in enterprise projects to store multiple instances and supports clustering environments based on the JMS messaging specification. RabbitMQ is a message broker which is executed in low-level AMQP protocol and acts as an intermediator between two application in the communication process.
Why use Akka net?
Akka.Net is a great choice when you need concurrency and distributed computation, as it allows you to work with high-level abstractions in lieu of threads and co-routines. It is resilient by design and supports adaptive load balancing, partitioning, routing, and configuration-based remoting.
When should I use Akka?
Any system with the need for high-throughput and low latency is a good candidate for using Akka. Actors let you manage service failures (Supervisors), load management (back-off strategies, timeouts and processing-isolation), as well as both horizontal and vertical scalability (add more cores and/or add more machines).
Who uses Akka?
Of our 50 case studies and community stories, 39 of them (78\%) are using Akka in production–happy clients include Walmart, Hootsuite, Huffington Post, WhitePages, Gilt, and Ticketfly.
What problems does Akka solve?
Akka provides a rich toolkit for addressing concurrency, scalability, and high-availability concerns. Akka’s Actors are extremely lightweight (you can easily create millions of Actors in a single application), reactive, and event-driven processes with a dedicated mailbox (message queue).
When should you use Akka?
Who is using Akka?
What is the difference between activeactivemq and Kafka?
ActiveMQ is pushbased messaging system and Kafka is pullbased messaging system . In AcitveMQ, Producer send message to Broker and Broker push messages to all consumers. Producer has responsibility to ensure that message has been delivered.
What is the difference between Akka and message distribution?
Message distribution systems are transports – they aren’t involved in the act of creating or consuming messages. Only in delivering and routing these messages from their sources and to their destinations. Where Akka.NET differs: Akka.NET actors are fundamentally message processing and message producing technologies.
What is the difference between Akka and RabbitMQ?
Akka.NET doesn’t persist or guarantee delivery of messages by default whereas Kafka, RabbitMQ, and other technologies typically do.
Why does Akka use in-memory messages?
This is because the vast majority of messages in Akka.NET are passed in-memory between actors running locally in the same processes, thus reliability guarantees stronger than “at most once” delivery (the simplest and least expensive delivery option) aren’t needed very often.