Does Gettier present cases of knowledge that are not cases of justified true belief?

On the face of it, Gettier cases do indeed show only that not all actual or possible justified true beliefs are knowledge — rather than that a belief’s being justified and true is never enough for its being knowledge.

What is the Gettier problem philosophy?

The Gettier problem, in the field of epistemology, is a landmark philosophical problem concerning the understanding of descriptive knowledge. Thus, Gettier claims to have shown that the JTB account is inadequate because it does not account for all of the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge.

Does Gettier think that Smith has enough evidence to believe that Jones will get the job and that Jones has ten coins in his pocket?

[e] The man who will get the job has ten coins in his pocket. Let’s suppose, says Gettier, that Smith sees the entailment from [d] to [e], and accepts [e] on the grounds of [d], for which he has strong evidence. In this case, Smith is clearly justified in believing that [e] is true.

What does gettier say about knowledge?

Gettier presented two cases in which a true belief is inferred from a justified false belief. He observed that, intuitively, such beliefs cannot be knowledge; it is merely lucky that they are true. In honour of his contribution to the literature, cases like these have come to be known as “Gettier cases”.

What is the gettier problem quizlet?

The Gettier Problem. Gettier is arguing that while Justification, Truth, and Belief may all be necessary for knowledge, they are not jointly sufficient.

Is knowledge justified true belief essay Gettier?

In Edmund Gettier’s essay, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge,” Gettier argues that JTB (Plato’s theory of Justified True Belief) does not necessarily guarantee knowledge. This means that the necessary but not the sufficient conditions for “S knows P” to be true have been met.

Is Gettier arguing that belief truth and knowledge are not sufficient for knowledge?

If justification is required for knowledge but want to reject that certainty is required for knowledge, then we must say that fallibly justified true belief is sufficient for knowledge. But Gettier argues that fallibly justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge.

What are gettier cases meant to show?

Why don’t Gettier counterexamples count as knowledge?

Many responses to Gettier counterexamples rely on some diagnosis of what’s gone wrong in those cases, an explanation of why they don’t count as knowledge. One popular general diagnosis is that in these cases, the fact that the person’s belief was true is just luck.

What is counterexamples and why is it important?

Counterexamples is a perfect way to disprove claims like “doubling a number always makes it larger” (not true for negative number or 0) or sorting out why every square is a rectangle, but not every rectangle is a square. For older kids, you can even go into much deeper topics, like: “every point on the number line is a rational number.”

How many counterexamples do you need to prove a statement true?

There are likely many examples that could be provided to make this statement true, but again, we only need one counterexample to prove it false. To find a counterexample to a conditional statement, you need an example to make the initial condition true, but at the same time, make the concluded statement false.

Is it possible to play counterexamples with kids?

It is possible to play Counterexamples with kids as young as kindergarteners as a kind of reverse “I Spy” (“I claim are no squares in this classroom. Who can find a counterexample?”).