Why is the Catholic Bible different from the KJV?

King James Bible is the English translation of the canon scriptures. Catholic Bible is considered to be complete as it contains all the scriptures that were in Hebrew and Greek. King James Bible is made in English, however, does not have the deuterocanonical books and also misses out on Apocrypha.

Is there any evidence of the Book of Mormon?

There is no archaeological evidence of the Jaredite people described in the Book of Mormon that is accepted by mainstream archaeologists. Nevertheless, some Mormon scholars believe that the Jaredites were the Olmec civilization, though archaeological evidence supporting this theory is disputed and circumstantial.

Does the Book of Mormon contain errors from the King James Version?

No, the Book of Mormon does not contain unique errors from the King James Version bible. And, apologists sometimes claim that what the CES Letter calls translation “errors” doesn’t necessarily agree with what Biblical scholars would call an “error” anyway. 3

Is there room for errors in the 1769 KJV edition?

There is no room in this tight process for 1769 KJV edition errors to show up or for all the problems that later required over 100,000 changes to the book (significant and insignificant). It was a “word-by-word, we’re not moving along unless you get it right” dictation from the Mormon god himself.

Is the Book of Mormon original or plagiarized?

But it’s not. In reality, the original text and current text of the Book of Mormon is a mixture of nineteenth-century nonsense, plagiarism, and selected existing KJV scripture verses including its 1769 KJV edition errors as well as 17th century italics made by 17th century translators.

Does the KJV have errors in the New Testament?

Schaff points out that in about 80 places in the New Testament, the KJV adopts Latin readings not found in the Greek. Erasmus had a corrupt, incomplete text of Revelation to work from, and hence this book has many errors in the KJV.