How do you use wasnt and werent?

When you use ‘I’ ‘He’ or ‘She’ i.e. singular pronoun then use wasn’t. When you want to use ‘We’ or ‘They’ i.e. plural pronoun, then use weren’t. For example- People weren’t talking about the incident. For example-that person wasn’t talking about the incident.

Is I am well correct grammar?

Therefore, “I’m good,” is a proper response. “I’m well” is also allowed but not for the reasons many think. That response only works if “well” takes on its adjectival form, meaning “in good health” or “good or satisfactory.” Now, if someone asks “How are you doing?” “I’m doing well” is the correct response.

What is wasn’t in grammar?

“Didn’t” is an auxiliary verb used in the past simple negative with regular verbs. “Wasn’t” is the past simple negative of the verb “to be” and it’s used with the subjects: I, He, She, It.

Is grammar more difficult than you think?

However, this is very far from the truth. The fact of the matter is that for most people grammar is much more complicated and difficult than they remember, and it can have a huge effect on the quality of their writing and how well it is received by the reader.

How do you use the phrase you must have told me?

You must have told me you weren’t coming to dinner. This construction is used to assert that something happened in the past when the evidence is incomplete. I don’t know why I decided to take my book with me.

What does you should have told me you weren’t coming mean?

You should have told me you weren’t coming to dinner. Here the speaker is saying that it was bad that you didn’t tell them that you weren’t coming. Here should is about obligation. When a speaker uses should like this, they are talking about what things are good things to do – or bad things to do.

What does you must have told me you weren’t coming to dinner?

You should have told me you weren’t coming to dinner. I waited for two hours. As you noted, this construction indicates dissapointment that an act was not performed. You must have told me you weren’t coming to dinner. This construction is used to assert that something happened in the past when the evidence is incomplete.